{"id":10514,"date":"2026-06-10T15:51:03","date_gmt":"2026-06-10T07:51:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/?p=10514"},"modified":"2026-06-10T16:31:32","modified_gmt":"2026-06-10T08:31:32","slug":"rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/","title":{"rendered":"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Which Mid-Range Industrial SoC for Your Development Board?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"10514\" class=\"elementor elementor-10514\" data-elementor-post-type=\"post\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-f8dda2f e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent\" data-id=\"f8dda2f\" data-element_type=\"container\" data-settings=\"{&quot;jet_parallax_layout_list&quot;:[]}\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"e-con-inner\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-64eb967 elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"64eb967\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"iek-wrap\" style=\"font-family:'Segoe UI',Arial,sans-serif;max-width:860px;margin:0 auto;color:#1f2937;\">\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1.05rem;line-height:1.75;color:#374151;background:#f0f4ff;border-left:4px solid #3b5bdb;padding:1rem 1.25rem;border-radius:0 6px 6px 0;margin-bottom:1.5rem;\">\r\n  <strong>Short answer:<\/strong> Choose the <strong>RK3568<\/strong> if your project needs GPU-accelerated display, Android or multimedia capability, multiple video outputs, or aggressive BOM cost targets \u2014 the ieeker YKR-BP3568-V1 development board runs 30\u201340% cheaper than equivalent i.MX8M Plus hardware at volume. Choose the <strong>i.MX8M Plus<\/strong> if your application requires a real-time Cortex-M7 co-processor, DO-178\/IEC 61508 functional safety compliance, or NXP's 15-year longevity program for medical\/aerospace programs where supply commitment must be contractually guaranteed.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The RK3568 and NXP i.MX8M Plus occupy the same performance bracket \u2014 both are quad-core Cortex-A53 SoCs in the 1.8\u20132.0 GHz range, both target industrial IoT, HMI, and edge AI applications, and both are available on development boards from multiple vendors. Yet they make profoundly different engineering trade-offs, and choosing the wrong one costs real money: not just the BOM delta, but the BSP integration hours, the certification path, and the supply chain exposure over a 5-year program.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1.5rem;\">\r\n  This guide gives embedded engineers and hardware product managers a direct, criterion-by-criterion comparison \u2014 CPU architecture, GPU, NPU, display output, real-time capability, development board availability, BSP ecosystem, BOM cost, and supply longevity \u2014 so you can make the right call before the first PCB layout is committed.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<!-- Key Takeaways -->\r\n<div style=\"background:#f8fafc;border:1px solid #e2e8f0;border-radius:8px;padding:1.25rem 1.5rem;margin-bottom:2rem;\">\r\n  <p style=\"font-weight:700;font-size:0.9rem;text-transform:uppercase;letter-spacing:0.06em;color:#1a1a2e;margin:0 0 0.75rem;\">Principales conclusiones<\/p>\r\n  <ul style=\"margin:0;padding-left:1.25rem;color:#374151;font-size:0.97rem;line-height:1.9;\">\r\n    <li>RK3568 Mali-G52 GPU vastly outperforms i.MX8M Plus GC7000UL for OpenGL ES, Qt rendering, and multi-display HMI workloads<\/li>\r\n    <li>i.MX8M Plus has a dedicated 800 MHz Cortex-M7 real-time co-processor; RK3568 does not \u2014 critical differentiator for hard real-time control loops<\/li>\r\n    <li>RK3568 NPU: 1.0 TOPS. i.MX8M Plus NPU: 2.3 TOPS \u2014 i.MX8M Plus wins on AI inference throughput at this tier<\/li>\r\n    <li>ieeker YKR-RK3568 development board BOM cost runs 30\u201340% lower than comparable i.MX8M Plus boards at 1,000-unit production volumes<\/li>\r\n    <li>NXP i.MX8M Plus carries a contractual 15-year longevity program from NXP; Rockchip's RK3568J has extended industrial availability but without a 15-year written guarantee<\/li>\r\n    <li>RK3568 supports 4 simultaneous display outputs (MIPI DSI, dual LVDS, eDP, HDMI); i.MX8M Plus supports 2 (dual LVDS + HDMI or MIPI DSI)<\/li>\r\n    <li>Linux BSP maturity is strong on both; Android is significantly better supported on RK3568 than on i.MX8M Plus<\/li>\r\n    <li>For 95% of industrial HMI, IoT gateway, and edge AI applications \u2014 the RK3568 is the correct cost-performance choice<\/li>\r\n  <\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-3aecddb elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"3aecddb\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:2.5rem;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: At-a-Glance Specification Comparison\r\n<\/h2>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  Before the deep-dive, here is the full specification map. Bold entries highlight where one SoC meaningfully outperforms the other.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:0.9rem;margin-bottom:1.5rem;\">\r\n  <thead>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#1a1a2e;color:#fff;\">\r\n      <th style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;text-align:left;\">Parameter<\/th>\r\n      <th style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;text-align:center;\">RK3568 \/ RK3568J<\/th>\r\n      <th style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;text-align:center;\">NXP i.MX8M Plus<\/th>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n  <\/thead>\r\n  <tbody>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>CPU cores<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">4\u00d7 Cortex-A55 @ 2.0 GHz<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">4\u00d7 Cortex-A53 @ 1.8 GHz + <strong>1\u00d7 Cortex-M7 @ 800 MHz<\/strong><\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>CPU architecture<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>ARMv8.2-A (newer)<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">ARMv8-A<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>GPU<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>Mali-G52 2EE<\/strong><br><small>OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 2.0<\/small><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">Vivante GC7000UL<br><small>OpenGL ES 3.1, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2<\/small><\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>NPU<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">1.0 TOPS (RKNN)<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>2.3 TOPS<\/strong> (eIQ \/ TFLite)<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>Process node<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>22 nm<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">14 nm (TSMC)<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>Display outputs<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>4 simultaneous<\/strong><br><small>MIPI DSI + dual LVDS + eDP + HDMI 2.0<\/small><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">2 simultaneous<br><small>dual LVDS + HDMI or MIPI DSI<\/small><\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>Video decode<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>4K H.265\/H.264 @ 60fps<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">4K H.265\/H.264 @ 60fps<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>Ethernet<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>2\u00d7 Gigabit<\/strong> (independent MACs)<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>2\u00d7 Gigabit<\/strong> (with TSN support)<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>PCIe<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>PCIe 3.0 \u00d7 2<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">PCIe 3.0 \u00d7 1<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>USB<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">USB 3.0 \u00d7 1, USB 2.0 \u00d7 2<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>USB 3.0 \u00d7 2<\/strong>, USB 2.0 \u00d7 1<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>SATA<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>SATA III \u00d7 1<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">Ninguno<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>Bus CAN<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>CAN 2.0 \u00d7 2<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>CAN-FD \u00d7 2<\/strong><\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>Industrial temp.<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">-40\u00b0C to +85\u00b0C (RK3568<strong>J<\/strong>)<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">-40\u00b0C to +85\u00b0C (standard)<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>Longevity program<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">Industrial availability (RK3568J), no contractual 15-yr<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>15-year NXP longevity program<\/strong><\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\"><strong>Typical SBC BOM cost<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\"><strong>~$65\u201390 @ 1k units<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">~$95\u2013130 @ 1k units<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;\"><strong>Android support<\/strong><\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;text-align:center;\"><strong>Excellent<\/strong> (Android 12, well-maintained)<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.65rem 0.9rem;text-align:center;\">Limited (Yocto\/Linux primary)<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n  <\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-3c91412 elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"3c91412\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:2.5rem;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  CPU Architecture: Why the Cortex-M7 Co-Processor Is the Real Differentiator\r\n<\/h2>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  On paper, the RK3568 wins the single-core CPU race: its Cortex-A55 cores run at 2.0 GHz versus the i.MX8M Plus's 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53, and the ARMv8.2-A architecture brings modest IPC improvements over ARMv8-A. In practice, for the workloads these SoCs run \u2014 UI rendering, protocol handling, data acquisition, edge inference \u2014 this clock speed difference is imperceptible.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The genuinely important CPU difference is what the i.MX8M Plus adds that the RK3568 lacks: a dedicated <strong>Cortex-M7 real-time co-processor running at 800 MHz<\/strong>. This is not a minor specification footnote. The M7 runs an independent RTOS (FreeRTOS, Zephyr, or bare-metal) and has its own RAM, interrupt controller, and direct peripheral access \u2014 completely isolated from the Linux application processor cores. It enables deterministic interrupt response times in the <strong>sub-150 \u00b5s range<\/strong> without any impact from Linux scheduling jitter on the A53 cores.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  For comparison: the RK3568 with a <code>PREEMPT_RT<\/code> patched kernel achieves approximately <strong>180\u2013220 \u00b5s worst-case interrupt latency<\/strong> under load \u2014 solid for HMIs, IoT gateways, and most industrial control panels, but above the threshold for servo control loops that must close at \u22651 kHz. As one detailed benchmark on DEV Community notes: <a href=\"https:\/\/dev.to\/rocktech\/rockchip-vs-nxp-a-deep-dive-for-product-teams-choosing-their-next-embedded-soc-44eo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">\"For 95% of products \u2014 digital signage, control panels, edge cameras \u2014 Rockchip's latency is already over-engineered. If your servo loop must close at \u22651 kHz with &lt;150 \u00b5s jitter, pick NXP.\"<\/a>\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The practical decision rule: if your industrial application involves closed-loop motor control, synchronized multi-axis robotics, or functional safety certification that requires a certified real-time execution environment \u2014 the i.MX8M Plus's M7 co-processor is genuinely necessary. For everything else (HMI panels, IoT gateways, machine vision, digital signage, edge AI inference), the RK3568's PREEMPT_RT Linux performance is more than sufficient.\r\n<\/p>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-bb631bf elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"bb631bf\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:2.5rem;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  GPU Performance: The Biggest Practical Gap Between These Two SoCs\r\n<\/h2>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The GPU difference between the RK3568 and i.MX8M Plus is the most impactful specification for the majority of industrial embedded applications \u2014 and it strongly favors the RK3568.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The RK3568's <strong>Mali-G52 2EE<\/strong> is a modern Bifrost-architecture GPU with full <strong>OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, and OpenCL 2.0<\/strong> support. The i.MX8M Plus uses a <strong>Vivante GC7000UL<\/strong> \u2014 an older architecture that supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and OpenCL 1.2, with Vulkan 1.1 support added via driver update but with documented performance limitations in geometry-heavy workloads.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  In practice, this translates to meaningful differences in the exact workloads industrial embedded products run:\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;font-size:0.9rem;margin-bottom:1.5rem;\">\r\n  <thead>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#1a1a2e;color:#fff;\">\r\n      <th style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;text-align:left;\">Carga de trabajo<\/th>\r\n      <th style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;text-align:center;\">RK3568 Mali-G52<\/th>\r\n      <th style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;text-align:center;\">i.MX8M Plus GC7000UL<\/th>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n  <\/thead>\r\n  <tbody>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">Qt Quick 1080p UI @ 60fps<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">\u2705 Solid 60fps, ~35% GPU load<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">\u26a0\ufe0f 45\u201355fps under animation load<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">Android launcher \/ UI<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">\u2705 Smooth (full Android 12 support)<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">\u274c Android BSP poorly maintained<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">4K H.265 video decode (VPU)<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">\u2705 Hardware VPU, &lt;10% GPU load<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">\u2705 Hardware VPU, equivalent<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">Multi-display independent output<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">\u2705 4 simultaneous outputs<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">\u26a0\ufe0f 2 simultaneous outputs<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr style=\"background:#f8fafc;\">\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">OpenCL compute (image processing)<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">\u2705 OpenCL 2.0 full profile<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;border-bottom:1px solid #e2e8f0;text-align:center;\">\u26a0\ufe0f OpenCL 1.2 only<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n    <tr>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;\">Wayland\/Weston compositor<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;text-align:center;\">\u2705 Stable, well-tested<\/td>\r\n      <td style=\"padding:0.6rem 0.85rem;text-align:center;\">\u2705 Stable (Yocto reference)<\/td>\r\n    <\/tr>\r\n  <\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The GPU gap matters most for <strong>HMI panel applications<\/strong>. If you're building an industrial touch panel with Qt Quick, animated data visualization, or a kiosk-style Android interface, the Mali-G52's performance headroom means a smoother UI without display driver optimization work. The GC7000UL is a functional GPU but requires more careful Qt rendering configuration to reach equivalent frame rates. For purely headless applications (IoT gateways, protocol converters), the GPU difference is irrelevant.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  For more detail on Qt rendering performance on RK3568 specifically \u2014 including EGLFS configuration and common data-binding bottlenecks \u2014 see our <a href=\"\/es\/blog\/rk3568-industrial-hmi-panel\/\">ieeker YKR-RK3568 Qt HMI guide<\/a>.\r\n<\/p>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-94ff70f elementor-widget elementor-widget-image\" data-id=\"94ff70f\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"image.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-gpu-display-comparison.webp\" class=\"attachment-full size-full wp-image-10517\" alt=\"ieeker YKR-RK3568 development board driving 10-inch LVDS industrial display alongside i.MX8M Plus board with single display output\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-gpu-display-comparison.webp 1536w, https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-gpu-display-comparison-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-gpu-display-comparison-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-gpu-display-comparison-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-gpu-display-comparison-18x12.webp 18w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-256170b elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"256170b\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:2.5rem;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  NPU Comparison: 1.0 TOPS vs 2.3 TOPS \u2014 Does It Matter for Your Application?\r\n<\/h2>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  Both SoCs include a dedicated Neural Processing Unit, but with different architectures, toolchains, and effective throughput:\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<ul style=\"padding-left:1.25rem;color:#374151;font-size:1rem;line-height:1.9;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  <li><strong>RK3568 NPU (1.0 TOPS):<\/strong> Uses the same RKNN architecture as the RK3588's 6 TOPS NPU, meaning the <a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/rockchip-linux\/rknn-toolkit2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Kit de herramientas RKNN2<\/a> workflow (PyTorch\/TensorFlow \u2192 ONNX \u2192 RKNN quantized model \u2192 inference) is identical between platforms. Models validated on RK3568 deploy on RK3588 without re-quantization. Real-world inference for INT8 quantized MobileNetV2: approximately 35ms per frame \u2014 adequate for anomaly detection, basic object classification, and predictive maintenance models.<\/li>\r\n  <li><strong>i.MX8M Plus NPU (2.3 TOPS):<\/strong> Uses a Verisilicon VIP architecture accessed through NXP's <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nxp.com\/design\/design-center\/software\/eiq-ml-development-environment:EIQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">eIQ ML development environment<\/a> (TensorFlow Lite, ONNX Runtime). The 2.3 TOPS figure gives roughly 2\u00d7 the raw inference throughput of RK3568, enabling faster inference or larger model sizes at the same latency target. NXP provides well-maintained model optimization tools and documented INT8 quantization pipelines.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The practical question is whether 2.3 TOPS vs 1.0 TOPS matters for your specific application. For lightweight inference workloads \u2014 predictive maintenance anomaly detection on time-series sensor data, basic visual inspection at 5\u201310 fps, keyword spotting \u2014 1.0 TOPS is sufficient and the cost advantage of the RK3568 platform is decisive. For multi-stream video inference (running detection on 4+ camera feeds simultaneously) or low-latency vision inference at 30+ fps with ResNet-50 or larger models, the i.MX8M Plus's 2.3 TOPS provides meaningful headroom.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  One toolchain note: RKNN-Toolkit2 has a larger Chinese developer community and more industrial model examples available on GitHub than the i.MX8M Plus eIQ ecosystem. For teams that will build their own custom models, this practical documentation advantage can outweigh the raw TOPS difference in development time.\r\n<\/p>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-3190248 elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"3190248\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:2.5rem;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  From the Factory Floor: Why a German Automation Customer Switched from i.MX8M Plus to RK3568\r\n<\/h2>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  About eighteen months ago, we were approached by the hardware team at a German industrial automation company building a new generation of conveyor control panels. They had spent four months prototyping on an i.MX8M Plus SoM from a European vendor \u2014 a well-regarded platform with solid Yocto Linux support \u2014 and had hit two problems they couldn't resolve within their project timeline.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The first was display performance. Their Qt Quick HMI \u2014 a 10.1-inch LVDS panel showing real-time conveyor speed, zone occupancy, and a 60-second throughput trend chart \u2014 was rendering at a consistent 42\u201348fps on the GC7000UL GPU, not the 60fps their UI specification required. Their Qt consultant had spent two weeks tuning the rendering pipeline, reducing animation complexity, and adjusting batch rendering settings. Improvement was marginal. The root cause was that the GC7000UL simply didn't have enough fragment shading throughput for their specific combination of animated SVG icons and dynamic ListView components at 1280\u00d7800.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The second problem was BOM cost. At their planned production volume of 800 units per year, the i.MX8M Plus SoM was priced at approximately \u20ac87 per unit. Their product target margin required a compute module cost below \u20ac60. The gap was \u20ac27 per unit \u2014 at 800 units, that was \u20ac21,600 per year in margin erosion that had not been in the original product business case.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  We supplied a prototype ieeker YKR-RK3568 development board within five days of their inquiry. Their UI ran at steady 60fps on the Mali-G52 on the first boot, without any Qt configuration changes. BOM cost at their volume: approximately $72 USD \u2014 within budget. Their application had no hard real-time servo control requirement (the M7 co-processor was not needed), and their temperature environment was within the RK3568J's industrial grade range. The migration took six weeks: BSP bring-up on the new board, DTS update for their specific LVDS panel timing, and validation testing on the production conveyor line.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  They have been in production for fourteen months at 840 units shipped. Zero hardware failures attributable to the SoC selection. The \u20ac21,600 annual margin improvement paid back their BSP migration cost in the first production quarter.\r\n<\/p>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-13e495d elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"13e495d\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:2.5rem;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  BOM Cost, BSP Ecosystem, and Supply Longevity: The Three Procurement Factors\r\n<\/h2>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.15rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.5rem;margin-bottom:0.75rem;\">BOM Cost: 30\u201340% Lower on RK3568<\/h3>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The aggregate cost difference between RK3568 and i.MX8M Plus development boards at production volumes is driven by three components: SoC unit price, PMIC complexity, and memory configuration. As documented in a detailed Rockchip vs NXP analysis: <a href=\"https:\/\/dev.to\/rocktech\/rockchip-vs-nxp-a-deep-dive-for-product-teams-choosing-their-next-embedded-soc-44eo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">the SoC cost delta is approximately -30%, the passive and power-tree delta is approximately -10%, and the aggregate SBC delta runs 30\u201340% after PCB, connectors, and local assembly.<\/a> At 1,000 units annually, this gap is typically $25\u201340 per unit \u2014 a meaningful number in industrial product business cases.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.15rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.5rem;margin-bottom:0.75rem;\">BSP Ecosystem: Strong on Both, But Different Communities<\/h3>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  Both platforms have mature Linux BSPs. The differences are in community composition and Android support:\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<ul style=\"padding-left:1.25rem;color:#374151;font-size:1rem;line-height:1.9;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  <li><strong>RK3568 BSP:<\/strong> Large Chinese developer community, extensive Android BSP support (Android 11\/12), strong multimedia and display driver coverage, RKNN-Toolkit2 for NPU inference. Yocto support exists but is not the primary development path. BSP updates follow Rockchip's vendor kernel cadence.<\/li>\r\n  <li><strong>i.MX8M Plus BSP:<\/strong> NXP provides an official Yocto meta-layer (meta-imx) with well-documented industrial deployment path. <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Yocto_Project\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Proyecto Yocto<\/a> is the dominant build system in regulated industrial and medical embedded Linux deployments in Europe and North America. Android BSP exists but is not actively maintained. eIQ ML environment is well-documented for NPU deployment.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  If your team's production build system is Yocto-based \u2014 which is typical for European industrial OEMs building IEC 61508-compliant products \u2014 the i.MX8M Plus's official Yocto meta-layer provides a cleaner integration path than RK3568's primarily Buildroot\/vendor-kernel ecosystem. If your team uses Buildroot, Ubuntu, or Debian and has no Yocto requirement, RK3568 is well-served.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.15rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.5rem;margin-bottom:0.75rem;\">Supply Longevity: NXP's 15-Year Program vs RK3568J Industrial Grade<\/h3>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nxp.com.cn\/company\/about-nxp\/smarter-world-blog\/BL-I-MX-8M-PLUS-APP-PROCESSORS\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">NXP's i.MX8M Plus is part of their longevity program providing a minimum of 15 years of supply from product launch<\/a> \u2014 a contractual commitment that is verifiable and auditable, and which satisfies the supply chain risk requirements of medical device (FDA\/MDR), aerospace (DO-178C), and critical infrastructure programs.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The RK3568J is Rockchip's industrial-grade variant with extended temperature ratings and longer production runs than commercial-grade Rockchip SoCs, but Rockchip does not publish a 15-year contractual longevity commitment equivalent to NXP's program. For programs where a written supply commitment is a regulatory or contractual requirement from the end customer, this is a genuine differentiator in favor of i.MX8M Plus.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  For most industrial programs \u2014 IoT gateways, HMI panels, edge AI systems, industrial tablets \u2014 where the supply commitment required is 5\u20137 years rather than 15, the RK3568J's industrial-grade availability combined with ieeker's bonded inventory options provides sufficient supply security. We cover supply chain evaluation criteria in detail in our <a href=\"\/es\/blog\/embedded-board-manufacturer-evaluation\/\">embedded board manufacturer evaluation guide<\/a>.\r\n<\/p>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-8b6a05e elementor-widget elementor-widget-image\" data-id=\"8b6a05e\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"image.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" width=\"800\" height=\"534\" data-src=\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-selection-decision-framework-1024x683.webp\" class=\"attachment-large size-large wp-image-10518 lazyload\" alt=\"Engineer marking decision criteria on a printed RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus comparison checklist at engineering workstation\" data-srcset=\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-selection-decision-framework-1024x683.webp 1024w, https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-selection-decision-framework-300x200.webp 300w, https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-selection-decision-framework-768x512.webp 768w, https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-selection-decision-framework-18x12.webp 18w, https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-selection-decision-framework.webp 1536w\" data-sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" src=\"data:image\/gif;base64,R0lGODlhAQABAAAAACH5BAEKAAEALAAAAAABAAEAAAICTAEAOw==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 800px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 800\/534;\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-eff4d61 elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"eff4d61\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:2.5rem;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The Decision Guide: When to Choose Each Platform\r\n<\/h2>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.15rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.5rem;margin-bottom:0.75rem;\">Choose the RK3568 Development Board if:<\/h3>\r\n<ul style=\"padding-left:1.25rem;color:#374151;font-size:1rem;line-height:1.9;margin-bottom:1.25rem;\">\r\n  <li>Your application is a <strong>HMI panel or display terminal<\/strong> \u2014 the Mali-G52 GPU runs Qt Quick and Android UIs significantly better than the GC7000UL<\/li>\r\n  <li>You need <strong>more than 2 simultaneous display outputs<\/strong> \u2014 RK3568's 4 outputs cover dual-operator configurations that require a separate SoC or HDMI splitter on i.MX8M Plus<\/li>\r\n  <li>Your project is an <strong>IoT gateway, edge AI device, or NVR<\/strong> \u2014 PCIe 3.0 \u00d72, dual GbE, SATA, and CAN bus without external chips<\/li>\r\n  <li>Your team uses <strong>Android or needs a strong Android BSP<\/strong> \u2014 Android 12 is well-supported and actively maintained on RK3568; i.MX8M Plus Android BSP is effectively abandoned<\/li>\r\n  <li>Your <strong>BOM target is under $90\/unit at 1k volume<\/strong> \u2014 the 30\u201340% cost advantage is real and consistent<\/li>\r\n  <li>Your deployment requires <strong>5\u20137 year field life<\/strong> with ieeker's industrial RK3568J boards and inventory management \u2014 not a contractual 15-year supply commitment<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.15rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.5rem;margin-bottom:0.75rem;\">Choose the i.MX8M Plus if:<\/h3>\r\n<ul style=\"padding-left:1.25rem;color:#374151;font-size:1rem;line-height:1.9;margin-bottom:1.25rem;\">\r\n  <li>Your application requires <strong>hard real-time control loops closing at \u22651 kHz<\/strong> \u2014 the Cortex-M7 co-processor with dedicated RTOS is the only correct solution<\/li>\r\n  <li>Your product must meet <strong>IEC 61508, DO-178C, or ISO 26262<\/strong> functional safety certification \u2014 NXP provides pre-certified safety libraries and the M7 provides the isolated execution environment required<\/li>\r\n  <li>Your end customer or regulatory body <strong>requires a written 15-year supply commitment<\/strong> \u2014 NXP's longevity program is the only contractual option at this price tier<\/li>\r\n  <li>Your team is <strong>Yocto-first<\/strong> and building for European industrial certifications where the NXP meta-imx official Yocto layer is the correct build path<\/li>\r\n  <li>Your application requires <strong>higher NPU throughput<\/strong> (2.3 vs 1.0 TOPS) for multi-stream video inference or larger model sizes without the RK3588's cost and power<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-a45258b elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"a45258b\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:2.5rem;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  Project Case: Building a Multi-Zone Temperature Monitoring Gateway on RK3568\r\n<\/h2>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  A food cold chain logistics company in South Korea needed a multi-zone temperature monitoring gateway for their refrigerated warehouse network \u2014 24 temperature and humidity sensors per gateway via Modbus RTU, cellular uplink via M.2 LTE, a 4.3-inch LVDS local display showing zone status, and cloud forwarding to AWS IoT Core via MQTT\/TLS. Their engineering team had initially scoped the project around an i.MX8M Plus SoM based on familiarity from a previous project, with a per-unit budget of $85.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  After reviewing the requirements together, we recommended the RK3568J for three specific reasons: (1) the application had no real-time control requirement \u2014 the M7 co-processor would be unused silicon cost; (2) the LVDS local display with Qt status UI played to the Mali-G52's strengths; (3) the RK3568J's dual GbE + SATA + PCIe M.2 eliminated the need for external expansion chips that the i.MX8M Plus would have required to match the interface count.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  The prototype was running within three weeks using our ieeker YKR-RK3568 development board. The production custom carrier board was delivered in eight weeks. Per-unit cost at 300-unit annual volume: $74 \u2014 $11 under budget. The customer used the margin improvement to add a second cellular modem as a redundant uplink, improving their 99.7% uptime SLA to 99.95% with automatic carrier failover.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  They are now in their second year of production with 580 gateways deployed across six warehouse sites in South Korea and one in Vietnam. Field failure rate attributable to the gateway hardware: 0.17% (one board per 600 deployed), all attributed to connector damage from forklift impact rather than electronic failure.\r\n<\/p>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-7b577ad elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"7b577ad\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:2.5rem;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  ieeker RK3568 Development Boards for Industrial Projects\r\n<\/h2>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  ieeker manufactures YKR-RK3568-based development boards and SoMs for industrial applications \u2014 with in-house SMT production, validated BSP (Buildroot, Debian 11, Ubuntu 22.04, Android 12), and a direct engineering support line for integration questions. For projects transitioning from i.MX8M Plus or evaluating RK3568 for the first time, we supply single-unit evaluation boards with full SDK access and can provide a BSP feature parity checklist against your existing platform.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<ul style=\"padding-left:1.25rem;color:#374151;font-size:1rem;line-height:1.9;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  <li><strong>ieeker YKR-RK3568:<\/strong> Dual GbE, LVDS + MIPI DSI + eDP + HDMI, M.2 PCIe LTE slot, SATA III, CAN bus, RS-485. Available from single-unit for evaluation. See the <a href=\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/products\/rk3568-core-board-baseboard-development-kit\/\">ieeker YKR-RK3568 product page<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n  <li><strong>ieeker YKR-RK3568 SoM + Custom Carrier:<\/strong> For OEM programs requiring custom form factor or interface layout. NRE from $4,000, production from 50 units. See the <a href=\"\/es\/custom-development-board-design-guide\/\">custom development board design guide<\/a>.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n \r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  For projects where the RK3568's compute is insufficient \u2014 edge AI inference at 30+ fps, 8K video processing, multi-camera analytics \u2014 see our <a href=\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/products\/yky-3588s-rk3588s-8k-ai-sbc\/\">Placa de desarrollo RK3588<\/a> which maintains the same interface ecosystem and BSP workflow at 6\u00d7 the NPU throughput.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<div style=\"background:#1a1a2e;border-radius:8px;padding:1.5rem;margin:1.5rem 0;text-align:center;\">\r\n  <p style=\"color:#fff;font-size:1.05rem;font-weight:600;margin-bottom:0.5rem;\">Evaluating RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus for your project?<\/p>\r\n  <p style=\"color:#a5b4fc;font-size:0.95rem;margin-bottom:1.25rem;\">Share your interface requirements and application type \u2014 we'll provide a board recommendation and BSP feature comparison within 24 hours.<\/p>\r\n  <a href=\"\/es\/contact\/\" style=\"display:inline-block;background:#3b5bdb;color:#fff;font-weight:600;padding:0.75rem 1.75rem;border-radius:6px;text-decoration:none;font-size:0.97rem;\">\u2192 Request RK3568 Evaluation Board \u2192<\/a>\r\n<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-b9eec88 elementor-widget elementor-widget-html\" data-id=\"b9eec88\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"html.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<h2 style=\"font-size:1.5rem;font-weight:700;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:2.5rem;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  Preguntas frecuentes\r\n<\/h2>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.1rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.25rem;margin-bottom:0.5rem;\">\r\n  Is the RK3568 faster than the i.MX8M Plus?\r\n<\/h3>\r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  In single-threaded and multi-threaded CPU benchmarks, the RK3568's 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores are marginally faster than the i.MX8M Plus's 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 \u2014 approximately 10\u201315% higher single-thread performance. GPU performance is significantly higher on RK3568 (Mali-G52 vs GC7000UL). NPU throughput is higher on i.MX8M Plus (2.3 TOPS vs 1.0 TOPS). Real-time latency is better on i.MX8M Plus due to the dedicated Cortex-M7 co-processor. \"Faster\" depends entirely on which workload you measure.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.1rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.25rem;margin-bottom:0.5rem;\">\r\n  Can RK3568 replace i.MX8M Plus in an existing design?\r\n<\/h3>\r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  For applications without hard real-time requirements and without a 15-year supply contract requirement, yes \u2014 typically with 6\u201310 weeks of BSP migration work (DTS update, peripheral driver validation, application rebuild and testing). The main integration areas are: display timing configuration (DTS panel node), industrial interface drivers (CAN, RS-485), and application rebuild for ARM Linux (same architecture, straightforward recompile). Android migrations require additional BSP validation work.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.1rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.25rem;margin-bottom:0.5rem;\">\r\n  Does i.MX8M Plus support Android?\r\n<\/h3>\r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  NXP provides an Android BSP for i.MX8M Plus but it is not actively maintained as a primary platform \u2014 NXP's primary embedded software path is Yocto Linux. Android on i.MX8M Plus is functional for basic deployments but lags significantly behind RK3568's Android 12 BSP in terms of GPU driver optimisation, app compatibility, and BSP maintenance cadence. For Android-first applications (kiosks, tablets, signage), RK3568 is the correct choice.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.1rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.25rem;margin-bottom:0.5rem;\">\r\n  What does NXP's 15-year longevity program mean in practice?\r\n<\/h3>\r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  NXP's longevity program is a contractual commitment that the i.MX8M Plus SoC will remain in production and available for purchase for at least 15 years from its product launch date. This is verifiable in writing and can be cited in product documentation for medical device FDA submissions, aerospace DO-178C certification packages, and industrial automation contracts where end customers require documented supply chain continuity. It does not guarantee price \u2014 only availability.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.1rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.25rem;margin-bottom:0.5rem;\">\r\n  Which is better for an IoT gateway \u2014 RK3568 or i.MX8M Plus?\r\n<\/h3>\r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  RK3568 for the majority of IoT gateway applications. The RK3568 natively provides: dual GbE (LAN\/WAN separation), PCIe 3.0 \u00d72 (4G\/5G modem), SATA III (local historian SSD), CAN bus \u00d72, and three UARTs for RS-485 Modbus. The i.MX8M Plus provides dual GbE with TSN (useful for time-sensitive networking in industrial ethernet applications) and CAN-FD \u00d72, but lacks SATA and has only one PCIe 3.0 lane. For remote monitoring, data historian, and MQTT cloud forwarding gateways, RK3568 wins on interface breadth and cost. For industrial ethernet gateways requiring TSN or CAN-FD specifically, i.MX8M Plus has the edge. See our <a href=\"\/es\/blog\/rk3568-industrial-iot-gateway\/\">RK3568 IoT gateway guide<\/a> for the full deployment architecture.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<h3 style=\"font-size:1.1rem;font-weight:600;color:#1a1a2e;margin-top:1.25rem;margin-bottom:0.5rem;\">\r\n  What is CAN-FD and does it matter for my application?\r\n<\/h3>\r\n<p style=\"font-size:1rem;line-height:1.8;color:#374151;margin-bottom:1rem;\">\r\n  <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/CAN_bus\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">CAN-FD (CAN with Flexible Data Rate)<\/a> extends the classical CAN 2.0 protocol with higher data rates (up to 8 Mbps vs CAN 2.0's 1 Mbps) and longer data frames (up to 64 bytes vs 8 bytes). The i.MX8M Plus supports CAN-FD; the RK3568 supports CAN 2.0 only. CAN-FD matters for applications connecting to modern automotive-derived sensors, newer Bosch or Beckhoff industrial actuators that use CAN-FD, or any field device that transmits large periodic data payloads. For legacy industrial equipment using classical CAN 2.0 (the overwhelming majority of installed base), RK3568's CAN 2.0 support is fully sufficient.\r\n<\/p>\r\n \r\n<!-- References -->\r\n<div style=\"margin-top:2.5rem;padding-top:1.5rem;border-top:1px solid #e2e8f0;\">\r\n  <p style=\"font-size:0.9rem;font-weight:700;color:#374151;margin-bottom:0.75rem;\">Fuentes y referencias<\/p>\r\n  <ol style=\"font-size:0.87rem;line-height:1.9;color:#6b7280;padding-left:1.25rem;\">\r\n    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nxp.com.cn\/company\/about-nxp\/smarter-world-blog\/BL-I-MX-8M-PLUS-APP-PROCESSORS\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">i.MX 8M Plus: Machine Learning and Vision at the Edge \u2014 NXP Semiconductors<\/a><\/li>\r\n    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/dev.to\/rocktech\/rockchip-vs-nxp-a-deep-dive-for-product-teams-choosing-their-next-embedded-soc-44eo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Rockchip vs NXP \u2014 A Deep-Dive for Product Teams \u2014 DEV Community<\/a><\/li>\r\n    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/rockchip-linux\/rknn-toolkit2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">RKNN-Toolkit2 \u2014 Rockchip NPU Inference SDK \u2014 GitHub<\/a><\/li>\r\n    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nxp.com\/design\/design-center\/software\/eiq-ml-development-environment:EIQ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">eIQ ML Development Environment for i.MX \u2014 NXP<\/a><\/li>\r\n    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Yocto_Project\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Yocto Project \u2014 Wikipedia<\/a><\/li>\r\n    <li><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/CAN_bus\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">CAN Bus \/ CAN-FD \u2014 Wikipedia<\/a><\/li>\r\n  <\/ol>\r\n<\/div>\r\n \r\n<\/div><!-- end .iek-wrap -->\r\n<\/body>\r\n<\/html>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Short answer: Choose the RK3568 if your project needs GPU-accelerated display, Android or multimedia capability, multiple video outputs, or aggressive BOM cost targets \u2014 the ieeker YKR-BP3568-V1 development board runs 30\u201340% cheaper than equivalent i.MX8M Plus hardware at volume. Choose the i.MX8M Plus if your application requires a real-time Cortex-M7 co-processor, DO-178\/IEC 61508 functional safety [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10516,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Industrial SoC Comparison [2026]<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: GPU, NPU, real-time co-processor, BOM cost, and supply longevity compared. Decide which mid-range industrial SoC fits your development board project.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Industrial SoC Comparison [2026]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: GPU, NPU, real-time co-processor, BOM cost, and supply longevity compared. Decide which mid-range industrial SoC fits your development board project.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-10T07:51:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-10T08:31:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-industrial-soc-comparison.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ieeker\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ieeker\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Ieeker\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8c84cbebc78c3b57cc5d39e73de3eadb\"},\"headline\":\"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Which Mid-Range Industrial SoC for Your Development Board?\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-10T07:51:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-10T08:31:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/\"},\"wordCount\":3524,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-industrial-soc-comparison.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/\",\"name\":\"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Industrial SoC Comparison [2026]\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-industrial-soc-comparison.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-06-10T07:51:03+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-10T08:31:32+00:00\",\"description\":\"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: GPU, NPU, real-time co-processor, BOM cost, and supply longevity compared. Decide which mid-range industrial SoC fits your development board project.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-industrial-soc-comparison.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-industrial-soc-comparison.webp\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":1024,\"caption\":\"The RK3568 and i.MX8M Plus target the same industrial embedded market segment but make opposite trade-offs: RK3568 leads on GPU, multimedia, display outputs, and BOM cost; i.MX8M Plus leads on real-time control, functional safety, and longevity commitment.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Which Mid-Range Industrial SoC for Your Development Board?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/\",\"name\":\"ieeker.com\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"ieeker\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/logo\u767d.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/logo\u767d.png\",\"width\":554,\"height\":100,\"caption\":\"ieeker\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8c84cbebc78c3b57cc5d39e73de3eadb\",\"name\":\"Ieeker\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/9b2208ea44759888946102da78e30511.jpg?ver=1781088827\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/9b2208ea44759888946102da78e30511.jpg?ver=1781088827\",\"caption\":\"Ieeker\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.ieeker.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/author\/ieeker\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Industrial SoC Comparison [2026]","description":"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: GPU, NPU, real-time co-processor, BOM cost, and supply longevity compared. Decide which mid-range industrial SoC fits your development board project.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Industrial SoC Comparison [2026]","og_description":"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: GPU, NPU, real-time co-processor, BOM cost, and supply longevity compared. Decide which mid-range industrial SoC fits your development board project.","og_url":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/","article_published_time":"2026-06-10T07:51:03+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-10T08:31:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-industrial-soc-comparison.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"Ieeker","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ieeker","Est. reading time":"19 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/"},"author":{"name":"Ieeker","@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8c84cbebc78c3b57cc5d39e73de3eadb"},"headline":"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Which Mid-Range Industrial SoC for Your Development Board?","datePublished":"2026-06-10T07:51:03+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-10T08:31:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/"},"wordCount":3524,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-industrial-soc-comparison.webp","articleSection":["News"],"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/","url":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/","name":"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Industrial SoC Comparison [2026]","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-industrial-soc-comparison.webp","datePublished":"2026-06-10T07:51:03+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-10T08:31:32+00:00","description":"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: GPU, NPU, real-time co-processor, BOM cost, and supply longevity compared. Decide which mid-range industrial SoC fits your development board project.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-industrial-soc-comparison.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus-industrial-soc-comparison.webp","width":1536,"height":1024,"caption":"The RK3568 and i.MX8M Plus target the same industrial embedded market segment but make opposite trade-offs: RK3568 leads on GPU, multimedia, display outputs, and BOM cost; i.MX8M Plus leads on real-time control, functional safety, and longevity commitment."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/rk3568-vs-imx8m-plus\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"RK3568 vs i.MX8M Plus: Which Mid-Range Industrial SoC for Your Development Board?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/","name":"ieeker.com","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#organization","name":"ieeker","url":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/logo\u767d.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/logo\u767d.png","width":554,"height":100,"caption":"ieeker"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8c84cbebc78c3b57cc5d39e73de3eadb","name":"Ieeker","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/9b2208ea44759888946102da78e30511.jpg?ver=1781088827","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/9b2208ea44759888946102da78e30511.jpg?ver=1781088827","caption":"Ieeker"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.ieeker.com"],"url":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/author\/ieeker\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10514"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10514\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10527,"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10514\/revisions\/10527"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10516"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ieeker.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}